MB logoBeyond the ServiceBY MB · SERVICE INTELLIGENCE

Example report · fixed simulated data · 15 October 2026

REPORT 18

Repeat service visits and technical findings

Identify repeated corrective visits and use the original service evidence to guide follow-up.

Assets triggering repeat rule200
Rule2+ orders / 30 days
Recorded first-visit outcomes4,200
Resolved on first visit81.0%
Technical report exampleReport
Standard warrantyOpen report
Repair centerOpen report
InstallationOpen report
Recurring eventOpen report
Open orderOpen report

How this is calculated: Repeat alerts identify assets with at least two corrective orders in the 30 days before the report snapshot. First-visit resolution uses recorded Yes or No outcomes for completed jobs. Technical narratives and possible causes are simulated. Portfolio: 5,000 service tickets, 1,000 assets, 20 engineers, 50 accounts and 5 areas. The 500 set-optimization cases are a separate population and are excluded from service-ticket metrics.

Suggested next steps: Review the original fault, technical findings and verification results before assigning an investigation or corrective action.

What to keep in mind: A repeat visit does not by itself prove repair failure. Report metadata does not confirm an engineer signature, customer acceptance, safety release or an approved root-cause investigation.

Download complete sample PDF